mozar
Highly Honored Mass-Poster
      

Posts: 1524
|
 |
Naming Malware
« on: Nov 4th, 2004, 6:08am » |
Quote Modify
|
Hello , Kaspersky Labs is using the classification below : " ... NAMING OF MALICIOUS PROGRAMS : The verdicts VirWare, TrojWare, MalWare, RiskWare, AdWare, PornWare encompass programs which are classed as being malicious. Malicious programs have the following characteristics: Verdict: is as follows: Behaviour[ - Sub behaviour].OS.Name[.Modification:] Verdict: this is the umbrella description for a virus sample: VirWare, TrojWare, MalWare, RiskWare, AdWare, PornWare, SPAM, or Attack Behaviour: this defines the malicious program's payload. Backdoor, Virus etc. are all examples of Behaviour. A less threatening behaviour will be subsumed by the most threatening behaviour. For example, if a program has a backdoor function, but also infects files, the behaviour will be classified as Virus. If in addition to these behaviours, the malicious program spreads via network connections, the behaviour will be classified as Worm. Sub-behaviour: this category will not necessarily be present. If the malicious program does exhibit a sub-behaviour, this further defines the main behaviour. For instance, a malicious program classified as Trojan-Spy exhibits the sub-behaviour Spy and so on. The sub- behaviour is separated from the behavior by a dash. In the case of worms, the sub-behaviour appears as a prefix to the main behaviour: P2P-Worm, Net-Worm etc. OS defines the operating system in which the malicious program functions: Win32, BAT, IRC etc. Name provides the name of the malicious program Modification differentiates between the versions of a malicious program grouped under one name. An example of a name under the new classification system would be Trojan-Dropper.Win32.Agent.a. The categories Behaviour, OS and Name must all be present. ... " . All I know is that I would like to see * all * developers using the same malware's names and classification , not necessarily that one from KL . Regards , mozar
|